I posted about this earlier in the week, but Newsweek had an article that examined the facts in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. Not surprisingly, Moore wasn't too happy with Newsweek's article. He took the time to reply. Frankly, I'm not going to quote any of it. It just doesn't matter, because both are talking about such little things. You can read Moore's reply at his site. It's a great example of how even the truth is shitty for Bush, so why did he have to mislead?

The overall theme of stretched truths and misleading information in Fahrenheit 9/11 is what really bothers me and there is no easy way to address that. bah.